| Home > Past Exhibitions > Ordinary Culture: Heikes/Helms/McMillian |
Ordinary Culture: Heikes/Helms/McMillian
![]() |
Date: August 11 - November 19, 2006 Place: Medtronic Gallery |
|
|
Image: Jay Heikes, So There’s This Pirate… (Still 1300) , 2005 Tempera, marker, and graphite on photocopy Private collection Photo: Susan Alzner |
In his earlier work, Heikes, who splits his time between New York and Minneapolis, plumbed various sources of popular culture—from real-life celebrities such as Sharon Tate to characters from fictional narratives to rock bands. He once sought to explore his own cultural identity as a consumer through the summoning of well-known images, characters, and narratives, but has more recently turned inward toward his own psyche and identity as an artistic creator. His current series of structural investigations of myths, jokes, and symbols constitutes, according to one writer, an “attempt to purge himself of past cultural obsessions and influences in order to create a new space for artistic freedom.”
New York–based Helms considers himself something of an ethnographer, though not in any traditional sense. He is intrigued by “the ethos of violence and the romanticization of extremist ideology.” Based on this abiding interest—obsession, even—the artist has been producing an ongoing series of graphite drawings that depict the New Frontier Army, a fictitious militia group that practices group living, hunting, and possibly mass mayhem. While this representation of illegal, non-state-sanctioned collective actions seems very current, it also operates as an archetype of (anti)social human behavior. What ultimately emerges is a suggestion of the darker side of society and nationhood, modernity, and perhaps civilization.
Los Angeles–based McMillian, though employing diverse mediums, subscribes to no particular style or subject: his work can materialize with equal ease into a classically painted vanitas of rotting apples or a found discarded carpet. He often installs seemingly unrelated and irreconcilable pieces in canny and provocative combinations, an approach inspired by his view of an exhibition as a sentence made up of individual words. By doing so, McMillian invites viewers to a critical examination of history, aesthetics, and the institution of taste—and what gets omitted in their establishment.
Featuring works produced for this exhibition, Ordinary Culture is a concerted effort to scrutinize culture—that amorphous and abstract yet all-encompassing entity—from various angles. The artists open up paths to populism and extremism, fantasy and violence, and elitism and esotericism. Their statements, made up of many dissenting voices, remind us that despite our collective ideological belief, there may be no such thing as a “common culture” that we consume and inhabit. At the same time, Ordinary Culture is a reminder that all creative expressions, either strange or familiar, could very well be what make culture ordinary.
Curator: Doryun Chong
Related Events
![]() |
Discussion Gallery Talk with the Artists Jay Heikes, Adam Helms, and Rodney McMillian Thursday, August 10, 2006 7:00 pm |
Related Links
|
Centerpoints 6.5 http://blogs.walkerart.org/offcenter/2007/06/12/centerpoints-65/ Walker blogs, Off Center: Centerpoints | |
|
Museum Exhibition Title Graphics http://blogs.walkerart.org/design/2009/07/30/museum-exhibition-title-graphics/ Walker blogs, Design: Flat Files | |
|
First of the Best ofs http://blogs.walkerart.org/offcenter/?p=583 Walker blogs, Off Center: Exhibitions | |
|
An Ordinary Interview: Jay Heikes, Adam Helms, Rodney McMillian http://visualarts.walkerart.org/detail.wac?id=3322&title=Articles Linoleum, masks, and punchlines: the everyday materials and themes in the work on view in Ordinary Culture: Heikes/Helms/McMillian live up to the exhibition’s title, but the interplay between elements in each work—and between works by other artists—makes this installation of new art by Jay Heikes, Adam Helms, and Rodney McMillian anything but common. In a four-way e-mail exchange, exhibition curator Doryun Chong led a discussion of the materiality and meaning of their work. | |

